Community News

Minister Fassbender sends invite to local mayors

by Roger Stonebanks, citizen journalist

Community Minister Peter Fassbender has invited Greater Victoria mayors to meet him “on the topic of service and governance integration in the Capital region” later in November/early December.

Significantly, in a letter dated Nov. 5 to area mayors that was made public today (Nov. 16), there is no mention of “amalgamation” or a study of it.

Fassbender has already met area mayors and councillors at the Union of BC Municipalities last September. The previous community minister, Coralee Oakes, met local leaders in Victoria last summer.

“While individual interests and perspectives are diverse, there have been shared views on the common thread from the 2014 referenda results – namely, that there may be benefit to the region from local governments exploring further the question of how to better integrate services and governance,” Fassbender said in his letter.

“I know that informing the public and others about the current governance and services profile of the Capital region will be of continuing interest to many of you, especially respecting the number of services already undertaken in a shared or integrated way.



“Recognizing the range of ideas we have heard, I propose that we continue our conversation, with all local governments at the table, to consider how the region might wish to move forward and how the Province of British Columbia could support these efforts.”

Fassbender invited the mayors to the meeting and ” . . . we will build in future opportunities to engage your Councillors and Chief Administrative Officers.” He hoped that “you find this a reasonable path forward.”

Fassbender will speak Nov. 17 to the Greater Victoria Chamber of Commerce about “CRD Governance – the way forward.”

For the most recent news stories by Saanich Voice Online, see Facts are Sacred (Nov. 7) and Amalgamation Revisioning? (Nov.2).  

UPDATE: Here a recording of the Minister’s Nov 17th speaking event.



Facts are Sacred

by Roger Stonebanks, citizen journalist

There seems to be a renewed commentary about just what we did – and didn’t – vote on when different questions about amalgamation/governance were asked in the Nov. 15, 2014, municipal elections in Greater Victoria. To refresh our memories – here are the facts – the questions that were asked and the results of the referendums in eight municipalities:

SIDNEY — “Are you in favour of a provincially funded study to investigate the feasibility, costs and implications of amalgamating the three municipalities of the Saanich Peninsula?” YES – 2,566; NO – 1,232; eligible voters – 9,100.

NORTH SAANICH — “Are you in favour of a study, provincially funded, to investigate the feasibility, costs and implications of amalgamating the three municipalities on the Saanich Peninsula of Sidney, Central Saanich and North Saanich?” YES – 2,881; NO – 1,727; eligible voters – 9,055. 

CENTRAL SAANICH — “Should the District of Central Saanich petition the Province to fund a cost/benefit analysis of an amalgamation of Central Saanich, North Saanich and Sidney?” YES – 3,588; NO – 1,489; eligible voters 14,242.

SAANICH — “Do you support Council initiating a community-based review of the governance structure and policies within Saanich and our partnerships within the Region?” YES – 21,437; NO – 2,780; eligible voters – 80,986.

VICTORIA — “Are you in favour of reducing the number of municipalities in Greater Victoria through amalgamation?” YES – 18,351; NO – 4,601; eligible voters 69,624.

OAK BAY — “Are you in favour of the District of Oak Bay being amalgamated into a larger regional municipality?” YES – 2,184; NO – 3,594; eligible voters – 14,107.

ESQUIMALT — two referendums were presented, (1) “Are you in favour of the Township of Esquimalt exploring options to achieve efficiencies by further sharing some services with other municipalities?” YES – 3,731; NO – 578; eligible voters 14,545. (2) “Are you in favour of exploring the reduction of the number of municipalities within Greater Victoria through amalgamation?” YES – 2,905; NO – 1,404; eligible voters – 14,545.

LANGFORD — “Are you in favour of the City of Langford being amalgamated into a larger regional municipality?” YES – 2,222; NO – 2,209; eligible voters 23,864.


View Royal, Highlands, Colwood, Metchosin, Sooke — councils did not hold referendums. Eligible voters – 34,505.


Amalgamation Revisioning?

Blue Skies May be Clouding Over for the Pro-amalgamates in #YYJ

by Roger Stonebanks, citizen reporter

Peter Fassbender, the new minister for Community, Sport and Cultural Development, will outline current BC government thinking on amalgamation and governance in a luncheon speech to the Greater Victoria Chamber of Commerce on Nov. 17.

If recent indications stand up, he may not share the same ‘blue sky vision’ for amalgamating the Capital region as his predecessor, Coralee Oakes, expressed last March to a BC Liberal Party meeting in Victoria.

While the Chamber has    long been a proponent of amalgamating the region, the A-word is missing from the chamber’s recent lunch invitation – “Hear Minister Fassbender speak on CRD governance – the way forward!”

The A-word was also missing when Oak Bay Mayor Nils Jensen gave a newspaper interview about his meeting with Fassbender at the Union of BC Municipalities convention in September — “A-word off the radar for province,” the Oak Bay News reported.

Still, when Premier Clark replaced Oakes with Fassbender last July, the written mandate to Oakes was renewed unchanged to Fassbender with the A-word along with the alternative “integrate service delivery” – “Develop and present options to Cabinet on potential processes under which local governments could either amalgamate or integrate service delivery by June 30, 2016.”

Mayor Jensen told the Oak Bay News that he, Coun. Tom Croft and Chief Administrative Officer, Helen Koning, had “an open and frank discussion and certainly what I thought was quite different was the tone being set by Minister Fassbender around the whole question of amalgamation. The position that was very clearly articulated was that this government will follow the law and not change the law that says no municipality will be forced into amalgamation. He also said there would not be any studies done with a focus on amalgamation, but
his ministry was very much open to facilitating conversations about local governments working together efficiently and effectively.”

Jensen does not foresee the province “launching into any study of any kind with respect to the Capital Regional District. I think they see themselves more as a facilitator.”

Esquimalt Coun. Beth Burton-Krahn said the published commentary “certainly lines up with what Minister Fassbender said at the UBCM forum on Strong Communities” when he was asked about governance in Greater Victoria.

Burton-Krahn reported on the Facebook Page, Local Governance Talks 2.0, a page which she moderates, that Fassbender commented, “There is not a common point of view across the region – there are a variety of perspectives out of the referendum [in eight of 13 municipalities in Greater Victoria last November] and that current government policy – in fact legislation – means he will not force communities to do anything and that the government will not force anything.” He added that, “his staff will help facilitate any discussions with communities that wish to seriously explore options but he would not lead it, he would not lead

Meanwhile, Saanich is pressing ahead with its own governance review that voters approved last November in a referendum question that avoided the word amalgamation: ”Do you support Council initiating a community-based review of the governance structure and policies within Saanich and our partnerships within the Region?”

Saanich is seeking 13 Saanich residents to serve on its Governance Review Citizens Advisory Committee. (Application can be downloaded HERE). The committee members will be recommended to council by a focus group comprised of representatives of Saanich Advisory Committees plus two members of the Saanich Community Assoc. Network.

“All Saanich residents with an interest in this important topic are encouraged to submit an application. Council is committed to seek diversity – young adults, young parents, seniors, homeowners, renters, newcomers, long-time Saanich residents and taxpayers,” Saanich said in a press release.

The written application deadline is Nov. 20 and the committee will start work in January. Successful applicants must be prepared for a minimum 18-month commitment. All committee meetings will be open to the public.


For earlier news stories about amalgamation/governance, enter “amalgamation” in the search function

Councillors Report-out at the One-year Mark

by Michele Murphy

During the 2014 municipal election campaign, Saanich Voice Online (SVO) asked all candidates in Saanich, Central Saanich, North Saanich and Sidney to tell us, in 60 words or less, what they would like to have accomplished in their elected post by Nov 15, 2015, June 1, 2017, and October 1, 2018. We received responses from many, but not all, of the candidates.

We’ve opened the time capsule and asked the original respondents – those who were elected – to report back on their accomplishments so far.

Here’s what some of them had to say …


Alicia Cormier
Councillor, Central Saanich

AliciaDesired accomplishments completed by 2015
By Nov 2015, Council and the community is celebrating a successful first year of the new Economic Development Advisory Committee and approving its mandate as an ongoing committee.  The success includes the Agricultural Area Plan (Agri/Culinary Tourism) and tangible improvements for all businesses in Saanichton, Brentwood Bay, Keating, First Nations, as well as home based businesses.

Reporting back in 2015:
The Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) is underway with a mandate to advise and assist Council in pursuing the formation of an economic development function for the municipality and to concurrently advise and assist Council in carrying out the corporation’s strategic plan.

Membership includes a cross-section of businesses, community associations and residents from all parts of the District.   We are completing a survey to identify local needs and I will be reporting to Council on progress in the near future.


Christopher Graham
Councillor, Central Saanichchristophergraham-jpg

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
Implement bylaw changes to foster Keating Revitalization, including a comprehensive bylaw review of Keating Business Park to make redevelopment faster and easier and allowing live work force housing over businesses.  Begin in depth discussion with the Province to find feasible solutions to traffic safety on and off the highway.  Develop infill guidelines to allow infill development that compliments existing neighbourhoods.

Reporting back in 2015:
We are mostly on track.  My biggest accomplishment was the RGS, and council’s change of direction re-affirming the existing urban containment boundary.   Council is moving ahead with a Keating ‘Business Plan’ to update the land-use bylaws.  That is in the strategic plan and going to tender.  Council has a commitment to look at infill guidelines.  Hopefully we will be looking at that this coming year.


Carl I. Jensen,
Councillor, Central Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
I will be working with all community groups on the development of a walkability master-plan carlthat will create safe passage between all areas of Central Saanich. By this point I would like to see the plan completed laying out a priority list of roadside trails/paths scheduled for upgrade annually over the next 5-10 years.


Reporting back in 2015:

The Multi-Modal Transportation Project list for Central Saanich has been established, and we recently completed the first project: a bicycle lane on Wallace Drive from Prosser to Blossom Park. The second project that the District will be proceeding with in the future is the multi-use train on Stelly’s Cross Road from the Western Terminus (Tsartlip) to West Saanich Road.


Niall Paltiel
Councillor, Central Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
I will grow my understanding of the processes and establish a new voice at the Council table. I niallewill investigate the delivery of a more user-friendly municipal website as a measure to improve public outreach. I will also review our infrastructure, sidewalk, and traffic priorities to ensure a common sense and low-cost delivery.


Reporting back in 2015:
I am pleased that I have delivered on my November 2015 Goals for Central Saanich Council. I am growing in my role while working with our communications committee to deliver a new website that should be fully launched in 2016. Further, I have successfully advocated that Council add transportation, mobility and infrastructure projects to our strategic priorities over the next four years.



Susan Brice
Councillor, Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
After an affirmative vote on the ballot question* we are well underway with an open communitybriceconsultation to renew the governance within Saanich and throughout the region.
*Saanich ballot question: Do you support council initiating a community-based review of the governance structure and policies within Saanich and our partnerships within the region?

Reporting back in 2015:
As the first year of this term ends I am pleased to report that I have been appointed to some very important positions. I chair Saanich Parks, Recreation and Trails Advisory Committee, chair the CRD Parks Committee, serve on CRD Governance and CRD Finance Committee, trustee on the Municipal Finance Authority and chair the Victoria Regional Transit Commission.

I proposed to Saanich Council and received unanimous acceptance of a motion to support enshrining the right to a healthy environment in the Canadian Charter. Also, I proposed and had accepted a motion to Saanich Council that properties held by the municipality be governed by the same processes as private property when being considered for change or disposition. This is a commitment that I made during the last election.

As a council we continue to work on the ballot question relating to governance as approved by the voters in the 2014 election.


Dean Murdock
Councillor, Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
A food security task force has been established and has completed the development of a Food

Dean Murdock, Saanich Councillor

Dean Murdock, Saanich Councillor

Security Strategy that will assist the District of Saanich in implementing programs and policies that will ensure Saanich residents have access to health, local, affordable food options.

Reporting back in 2015:
I am pleased to see the Agriculture and Food Security Task Force coming together at last. Saanich is currently taking applications for participation on the Task Force (closing November 6) and seeking an expert consultant to facilitate and assist the Task Force to develop an Agriculture and Food Security Plan, with policies, action items and an implementation strategy. Access to healthy, local, affordable food options is vital for Saanich’s Food Future. I look forward to the Task Force coming together and the development of an Agriculture and Food Security Plan.


Colin Plant
Councillor, Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
Working with the newly elected Council, Saanich’s Council Procedure Bylaw has changed to Colin Plantallow for presentations to Council as well as permitting for questions to be posed at the end of meetings. Additionally, Council and Committee of the Whole meetings can be viewed online.

Reporting back in 2015:
I am very pleased to write that Saanich has introduced a new Procedures Bylaw that allows for greater pubic participation at meetings.  This includes delegations, commenting on agenda items as well as the creation of a monthly Open Forum. While we have not yet introduced webcasting, we have budgeted for it to happen this year.



Heather Gartshore
Councillor, North Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
Council will be adopting a Local Area Plan, which addresses growth by way of increased housingheather density in the McTavish/East Saanich/Canora Road area, having been informed by a thorough public consultation process in which residents have confidence. Being respectful, I will have enjoyed a first year in office, with plenty of healthy debate, free of acrimony and friction.


Reporting back in 2015:
Council unanimously supported a motion to undertake a Goals and Community Values Survey, assessing attitudes related to future growth and density in North Saanich. The results will inform our next steps regarding the need for an OCP review and potential scope.

It is a pleasure to work with my colleagues at North Saanich, and a privilege to serve my community.


Geoff Orr
Councillor, North Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
Initiate local area planning for the McTavish and Tsehum housing areas. Contribute positively orrto effective Council dialogue. Participate in the Saanich Peninsula Housing Partnership initiative. Determine whether or to what extent a review of the OCP is warranted. Take appropriate action based on the outcome of the amalgamation question.

Reporting back in 2015:
The council dialogue has been respectful and constructive. Housing discussions took place as part of strategic planning exercise. Council recently endorsed staff recommendation to carry out community survey. Our housing partnerships have been active and the CRD recently completed a housing gap analysis, which will be considered as part of further action by Peninsula municipalities. OCP review decision will follow community survey results. There has been correspondence with the Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development regarding amalgamation question results. Future direction is uncertain. Advanced conversations with Victoria Airport Authority and the Ministry of Forest, Lands and Natural Resource Operations related to a public boat ramp in Pat Bay. (Note from editor – this came in in point form and has been revised to fit SVO’s formatting)


Celia Stock
Councillor, North Saanich

Desired accomplishments completed by 2015
Draft of an Affordable Housing Policy is being written; A Council approved Review of portions stockof the Official Community Plan (OCP) is underway; That property tax can be maintained at reasonable levels, with minimal increase; That there is momentum on the Sandown development agreement for the commercial property.

2015 is the Jubilee celebration for North Saanich.  As a member of the Planning Committee, I would like to look back and say, we have had a wonderful, exciting Jubilee year with many memorable events for all residents; That I will have been able to mentor and assist new Council members with our work, so that Council can be more effective, and these members will have had an easier transition to Councillor.


Reporting back in 2015:
Property tax has been maintained at reasonable levels, with only a minimal increase in 2015.

Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond Council’s control, we have not had much momentum on development of the commercial portion of the Sandown property.

Our North Saanich Jubilee year celebration has been highly successful, with historic story telling, pancake breakfast new Jubilee Park dedication, Aviation Museum commemoration and other events, which have included all residents.  These have been happy and jubilant events for all.

We have an effective, hard working Council, and I have assisted new Council members with the transition to Councillor.



SVO has not received any responses from Sidney councillors.

SVO will update this article as additional responses come in.

Sidney’s Community Mailboxes are Here to Stay

by Roger Stonebanks, citizen reporter

For Sidney, Canada Post’s decision to temporarily suspend the conversion across Canada of home mail delivery to community mailboxes came too late – the 110 community mailboxes constructed earlier this year went into operation on Monday (Oct. 26, 2015). If the conversion were planned for November or later – it would have been suspended.

Sidney residents were advised last May that the switch would be made in the fall for 3,300 addresses that had received home delivery.

Canada Post announced in a statement just seven days after the defeat of the Harper Government in the October 19th federal election that they are temporarily suspending future deployment of the program to convert door-to-door mail delivery to community mailboxes. You can find their complete statement HERE.

What’s Going on Here?

Sometimes the dry Minutes of municipal council meetings suggest more than is recorded.

Dean Murdock, Saanich Councillor

Dean Murdock, Saanich Councillor

by Roger Stonebanks, citizen journalist

Below is an example from the Saanich council meeting of Sept. 28, 2015, detailing how Coun. Dean Murdock resigned – or tried to – from the Finance, Audit and Personnel Standing Committee (FAP) earlier this year. Mayor Richard Atwell responded as shown in the Minutes. Saanich Voice Online (SVO),has emailed Coun. Murdock and Mayor Atwell to ask them to comment.

Coun. Murdock told SVO that it has been “a great experience to serve on FAP” since 2008. “I’ve taken on many additional commitments as a councillor since first starting serving on FAP and the time has come for me to focus my energies elsewhere. Coun. Wergeland, who does not chair any other Saanich committees or serve on any of the regional committees, has offered to serve on the committee. To date, Mayor Atwell has not responded to either of us on this matter.

“In my seven years on council, I’ve been appointed to, and stepped down from, several committees and boards [he listed 15 to SVO]. This is the first time I’ve ever had the chair refuse to accept or acknowledge my resignation.”

Minutes of the Sept. 28, 2015, Saanich council meeting.

FINANCE, AUDIT AND PERSONNEL STANDING COMMITTEE Memo from Councillor Murdock dated September 15, 2015 requesting Council direction on the membership of the Finance, Audit and Personnel Standing Committee.

Councillor Murdock stated: – He had provided Mayor Atwell with his resignation from the Finance, Audit and Personnel Standing Committee (FAP) on May 28, 2015; he met with the Mayor in June to discuss and left the meeting understanding that his resignation had been accepted. – In the September FAP minutes, it was noted that he sent his regrets for the meeting; Councillor Murdock would like confirmation of his resignation.

Mayor Atwell stated: – Mayors appoint Council members to Standing Committees and can rescind appointments; a letter of resignation is not typically the practice. – It is a Council member’s responsibility to respond to the Mayor’s appointments and to fulfil their mandate under the Community Charter which is to participate in meetings to which they are appointed. – He would like to defer the discussion about committee membership and revisit Councillor Murdock’s resignation.

Councillor Murdock stated: – He is open to discussing committee membership but it is not his intention to participate further on FAP.

Mayor Atwell stated: – Council members have a responsibility to participate on committees; further discussion should take place and a replacement could be appointed.

Councillor Wergeland stated: – He is interested in serving on the FAP committee. – He is concerned that this item has come forward at a Council meeting.

Councillor Derman stated: – It is the prerogative of the Mayor to appoint Standing Committee members; the Community Charter does not state that “members must serve”; it speaks to “members who are willing to serve”. – Councillors should have the right to decline serving on a committee if they choose.

Councillor Brownoff stated: – Standing Committees are appointed by the Mayor; Council needs to recognize that Councillors’ workloads are different.

Councillor Sanders stated: – Councillors may have work and family obligations which may make attending meetings difficult; we don’t want to preclude residents who work full time from running for municipal Council.

MOVED by Councillor Brice and Seconded by Councillor Murdock: “That the report from Councillor Murdock dated September 15, 2015 be received; and that the item be referred to a future meeting for further discussion.” CARRIED

Here is Coun. Murdock’s Memo

Memo To: Mayor and Council
From: Councillor Dean Murdock
Date: September 15, 2015
Subject: Finance, Audit & Personnel Membership

I wrote to Mayor Atwell on May 28th to indicate that after six years as a committee member, the time has come for me to step down from the Finance, Audit and Personnel Standing Committee (attached). Mayor Atwell and I met on June 29th, and I left the meeting with the understanding that he had accepted my resignation from the committee.

Much to my surprise, the draft minutes for the FAP meeting held on September 3rd, indicate that I had sent regrets for the meeting. It was my expectation that, as I am no longer a member of the committee, my name would not appear in the minutes as not attending. It is my hope to have this matter clarified and my resignation from FAP confirmed.

I have asked that the issue of FAP membership be included on this evening’s agenda to seek Council’s direction on the membership of the FAP committee.

Dean Murdock
Saanich Councillor

Here is Coun. Murdock’s email to Mayor Atwell of May 28, 2015

Hi Richard,

As you consider restructuring FAP, I respectfully request that my name not be included as a member. I’ve served on FAP since 2008 and have enjoyed it tremendously. It’s extremely valuable to gain an understanding of the workings of each department.

As my professional role continues to evolve, it is increasingly challenging for me to attend meetings during the day. The water commission and library board (on which I also sit) both meet near my office over the lunch hour, which make them easier to attend. Regrettably, I’m not able to make myself available to attend FAP or the restructured committees that replace it.

Thanks very much.
Dean Murdock
District of Saanich

UPDATE (“What’s Going on Here” – continued)

Saanich Voice Online has noticed that the District of Saanich website has two postings since the council meeting on Sept. 28, 2015, that list municipal committee appointments. One is “revised” dated Oct. 8, 2015, the other is “revised” dated Oct. 13, 2015. In both postings Coun. Dean Murdock’s name does not appear on the Finance, Audit and Personnel Committee (although, confusingly, his posted biography still has him as a member of FAP).

 SVO asked Mayor Richard Atwell and Coun. Murdock for comment.

 Coun. Murdock replied:  “I’m not aware of the changes to the membership list. As far as I’m aware, there have been no formal changes to FAP membership. I have asked that the minutes indicate my resignation from the committee, as received by Council on Sept 28.”

 SVO has not received a reply from Mayor Atwell.

 The FAP is a “standing committee” meaning that the mayor appoints the members. The current composition of the committee is – Mayor Atwell as chair, and Couns. Vicki Sanders, Colin Plant and Fred Haynes.



by Roger Stonebanks

Aragon (Cordova Bay) Properties Ltd. has submitted (Sept. 30, 2015) its rezoning application to Saanich for development of the 26-acre (10.6 hectares) former Trio property at Cordova Bay Road/Alderley Road/Fowler Road. As previously reported, the plan is for 385 dwelling units in a mix of attached and detached houses, condos ranging from three to six storeys and a small commercial space. The site plan is available HERE and is also posted on the District of Saanich website.

SVO’s most recent article on the Cordova Bay development can be found HERE.

TIME FOR A REAL CONVERSATION – Suggests civic educator Mona Brash to Central Saanich

by Sue Stroud

“The last amalgamation in BC was that of Abbotsford and Matsqui to form the City of Abbotsford in 1995,” explained civic educator Mona Brash speaking at the Residents and Ratepayers of Central Saanich Society (RRoCSS) meeting last spring. “Now, some in the newly-formed municipality are expressing concerns about unexpected social problems that arose because of that amalgmation.”

Brash explained that many problems arose from the increase in development that took place following Abbotsford’s amalgamation. The social problems included homelessness, caused by rapid growth and gentrification; and degradation of the area’s natural eco-systems: stream quality was affected, wildlife habitat threatened, tree retention lost.

Brash suggested that a great place to start when considering amalgamation is to consider what local government is, and what purpose it serves. She explained that it is often the civic level of government that is touted as the level of government closest and most directly impacting the daily lives of citizens. It is also the level at which c i t i z e n s have the most input into decision-making and can most easily hold politicians accountable.

Some of the questions that came up during discussion at Brash’s presentation included: “Would Central Saanich lose control over its farmland if it was amalgamated with North Saanich and Sidney? How many councillors would there be and from where? How would a change in councillor/citizen ratio impact local accountability and control? Would reducing 27 councillors to nine reduce local input? Who would such a change benefit?”

Some RRoCSS members expressed concern that it would be easier for developers to pressure councils if the councillors were from areas not impacted by the development. For example councillors from an urban area like Sidney might be less inclined to pay heed to concerns brought forward by citizens of rural Central Saanich where farmland preservation, stream protection and other issues are paramount. The loss of local councillors could equate to some loss of local autonomy and accountability.

Brash suggested that community organizations, like the Ratepayers, are wise to be out in front of the issue of amalgamation, so that special-interest groups from outside the community do not control the agenda. She noted that current BC legislation prohibits the provincial government from imposing amalgamation on local governments.

Brash concluded by suggesting to the Ratepayers that, “Your side on this issue is concerned with what happens to democracy and local control, the ‘yes’ emphasizes policing and other shared services and reduced costs.”

She added, “It’s time to make the ‘yes’ side provide fully documented local examples to prove their case.”


Saving Door-to-Door?

Community Mailboxes coming to Sidney this Fall.

by Roger Stonebanks, and Michele Murphy

Canada Post is expected to start installation shortly of community mailboxes in Sidney with full implementation in the fall for 3,300 addresses that now receive home delivery of mail. Affected residents in Sidney were advised of the change last May.

The news is contained in the minutes of the Sidney council meeting of July 13. The change is part of a nation-wide switch to community mailboxes.

Marnie Armstrong, director of municipal engagement for Canada Post, told Sidney council that the shift from paper to

digital correspondence means Canada Post must change the way it delivers mail. She said that two-thirds of Canadians now receive mail via community mailboxes.

But not everyone is happy with the change, nor do they agree that it is necessary.

A petition on is currently sitting with over 225,000 signatures, just 75,000 shy of its 300,000 goal. The petitioners claim that the impact on particular groups of Canadians hasn’t been properly considered, citing residents of areas with considerable snowfall, or sweltering heat, people with disabilities, and the elderly. The petition also cites the loss of a projected 8,000 jobs at the Crown Corporation, as well as neighbourhood degradation as reasons for reconsidering of the decision.

Residents in rural Saanich woke to find their community mailbox had been the target of another break-in. Photo courtesy Saanich South MLA Lana Popham.

Residents in rural Saanich woke to find their community mailbox had been the target of another break-in. Photo courtesy Saanich South MLA Lana Popham.

Armstrong told SVO that Canadians are using the postal service much differently today – for example, mail volume has

dropped to 4.6 billion pieces in 2014 from six billion in 2006. Doorto-door delivery costs $289 per address compared with $111 for a community mailbox in 2014, she said.

But the Canadian Union of Postal Workers tells a different story. The union says that the financial situation of Canada Post

Corporation does not require such drastic service cutbacks. They claim that in the second quarter of 2014 the Canada Post Corporation reported $62 million in profit and has reported profits in 17 of the past 19 years.

While Sidney doesn’t suffer great snowfalls or sweltering heat, and is not home to a mail sorting plant and as such won’t suffer great job losses, it is home to a great many seniors. Most of the 11,000 plus people who live in Sidney are over 50 years old. In fact, the federal riding of Saanich-Gulf Islands is the third largest senior population in Canada and the highest median age.

What may be the most radical opposition to the mail delivery change came in August as Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre took a jackhammer to a newly poured community mailbox footing, a stunt that may see the mayor charged with a criminal offence. SVO has asked Sidney Mayor Price if he has plans to don a hard-hat and visi-vest in defence of his citizens’ rights to door mail delivery, but we have not heard back as yet.

Jonathon Dickie, in MP Elizabeth May’s office, said they received a flurry of feedback right after the initial announcement, “But constituents now seem resigned that there is little that can be done to reverse the decision until after the general election.”

The NDP, which is leading in the polls at the time of this posting, announced that, if elected, they will terminate Canada Post’s phase-out plan and restore service to those households that have already lost their home mail delivery.


Heaving Steve – But How?

Making big change takes more than just a ballot-box mark

by Michele Murphy

#HeaveSteve is a thing. Apparently a big thing. In an August online poll on, more than 73% of respondents said that they would vote strategically in order to change government.

A quick Google search of the popular hashtag will turn up almost half a million hits – like the emerging Youtube sensation “Heave Steve – Prince Albert Riding 2015.” The little ditty’s second verse laments, “the glacier’s are melting, and there’s water on the run, we’re burning up the oil when we’ve got the wind and sun, and with Stevie at the helm, nothing’s being done!” While not on this year’s Billboard charts, it is gaining national attention after Council of Canadians chairperson Maude Barlow apparently encouraged members to show the video at each tour stop this election season, and it’s rocking #54 on the Top 50 Stephen Harper Protest Songs playlist (another thing).

Non-Conservative federal politics has long been heated in the south Vancouver Island region with New Democrats, Liberals and Greens battling it out for the anything but Conservative (ABC) vote. A quick glance through the #cdnpoli Twitter feed will see any number of discussions amongst progressives on Canada Pension Plan contributions, family law, caucus whipping, voting reform, senate abolition, and even the contentious Bill C-51, the Conservative’s anti-terror bill, (anti-democracy bill?). But in the big picture these could easily be considered nuances among progressive ideas. The one thing that all ABC voters can agree on is Stephen Harper must go.

But how does one effectively Heave Steve?

If polls are any indication of actual voter intention then the NDP’s Thomas Mulcair should be booking a truck for the move into Sussex Drive in October. has both Randall Garrison and Elizabeth May back in Ottawa in time for the first snowfall. But polls are increasingly unreliable, and this election campaign is unprecedentedly long. A lot can happen in the days ahead, and the Conservatives have been thought to pull some very shifty tricks at the last minute (election eve calls from the “NDP” in 2009 that saw Liberal hopeful Briony Penn lose by less than the unrequited votes sent the NDP’s way).

Sadly, for the local voters who think Harper is past his expiry date, the election of two incumbent non-Conservative MPs won’t ensure Harper gets taken off the shelf. What can a Saanich and the Peninsula progressive do to make a difference in the big picture outcome besides making their mark on October 19th? What other agency do you have to make a difference? According to both Dogwood Initiative and, lots.

Both Dogwood and Leadnow are non-partisan progressive advocacy groups working towards change in Canada. Leadnow’s main focus is on democracy, climate change, and economic inequality; Dogwood’s is reclaiming decision-making power over air, land and water. Their tools: social media, telephones, doorbells, and people.

For the 2015 election Leadnow has created the Vote Together campaign asking people to take a pledge to vote and campaign strategically. The goal, campaign manager Amara Possian told the Huffington Post, is to defeat Conservative candidates by uniting centre-left voters around one candidate in selected ridings. Leadnow asks that voters not only mark their ballots strategically, but focus their donations and their volunteer time with the big-picture in mind. “Regardless of where you live, each and every one of us has a crucial role to play in the Vote Together campaign,” they write in a recent email to their list. The group has identified 72 Conservative swing ridings that they feel efforts to avoid vote-splitting will make a difference. And they are asking for all the help you can give – donations, phone callers, door-knockers directed to these specific swing ridings.

Likewise, Dogwood Initiative, based in Victoria, has done its own polling and analysis, and has teams on the ground ready to influence wherever they can around progressive change through the federal electoral process. And they are asking for support as well, through donations and volunteering in ridings that they feel will make the most difference.

Leadnow executive director Lyndsay Poaps told The Tyee this past August that, “In 2011 a majority of Canadians voted for change, but the non-Conservative vote was split. Sixty per cent of the electorate voted against Harper, but the Tory leader emerged with 100 per cent of the power in Ottawa.”

We’ll find out on October 19th if Heaving Steve was really a thing.

For more information:
CBC Poll Tracker

Rabble Poll on Strategic Voting 
13 Swing Riding Polls – Wave One
CUPE letter to LeadNow

James Joinery
Carol James - Realtor
Original Fire Creative Studio
Fraser Plumbing
Rob Fleming
McGinnis Electric
Keating Hi-Tech
Lifestyle Market
Lana Popham
Getz & Burden
Moodyville New
Carnivore tall - seafood